Montana Hi-Line : Population & Economics.gif)
 |
| Old
Grain Elevator on the Hi-Line |
The Montana Hi-Line region is a place of contrasts, of solitude
and of scenic beauty. And as the Hi-Line has seen little
in the way of growth over the past years, in some ways, a
trip along the Hi-Line resembles a trip back in-time. Many
of the towns along the Hi-Line look no different now than
they did 40 or more years ago. And perhaps that is why I
like the Montana Hi-Line region. Unlike other areas of the
state, that have either been heavily developed or over-run
by tourists or have been converted into sprawling subdivisions
built with out-of-state money, the Montana Hi-Line region
has been essentially forgotten.
The Hi-Line region of Montana is not alone in having been
passed over by the relentless pace of development that has
arisen throughout most of the United States the past several
decades. Indeed, that lack of not being the only place that
has been forgotten is one of the biggest challenges the Hi-Line
region faces. Few people realize that today more than 60
counties in the Great Plains of the United States have fewer
residents now than they did in 1930. In essence, not only
has the Hi-Line region been passed over by the torrid pace
of development seen elsewhere, a vast swath of the heartland
has met a similar fate. Numerous counties in Texas, Oklahoma,
Kansas, Nebraska, eastern Colorado, and the Dakotas all share
in this peculiar shift of people and resources away from
the high plains to other areas of the United States.
The
results of this shift in population and resources are obvious
to see. Countless farms and ranch buildings now lay
vacant across the Great Plains of the United States. The
homes are dormant, the outbuildings are falling down, but
yet the land around them is fertile and in production, having
been bought out by nearby farms and ranches. This is the
process of agricultural consolidation; an event that began
during the 1930’s and has been continuing ever since.
The process of agricultural consolidation arose due to the
inability of small farms and ranches to compete with first
their larger neighbors, and then their inability to compete
on the world agricultural market. As such, as smaller farms
were sold and abandoned due to their inability to turn a
profit, the land these farms and ranches were on was bought – keeping
the land itself in production.
Another
factor at play in the decline of the number of people in
the farm and ranch business is the miracle of agriculture
productivity. Decades ago, agriculture was still a labor
intensive business – often times requiring significant
pools of labor to do what is now done today by one person
and a good, modern tractor. The dramatic increase in productivity
in the agricultural industry has, in short, allowed vastly
more land to be harvested by fewer and fewer people.
This duo combination of vastly improved agricultural productivity
combined with the ever increasing sizes of the farms and
ranches has been the great contributor to the loss of population
in the Great Plains over the past decades. Yet, this only
tells part of the tale on why most areas of the Great Plains
have been losing population.
 |
| Downtown
Harlem, Montana |
The
other part of the story can be directly seen in the numerous
small towns across the Montana Hi-Line region and
elsewhere in the Great Plains. As the farms and ranches become
bigger and bigger, requiring fewer and fewer people to operate,
the nearby towns have often suffered terribly. The reason
for this is because most of the small towns in the Great
Plains rely almost solely on the agricultural economy for
their prosperity. The consolidation in the agricultural industry,
combined with the productivity miracle, has created a nasty
cycle of having fewer people involved in the agricultural
economy. This loss of people then leads to less demand for
local businesses, most of whom are directly dependant, one
way or another, on the agricultural economy. Virtually every
business in an agricultural small town has been affected
by this change, ranging from auto-dealers, to restaurants,
to banks, to grain elevators, to barbers, to hotels and a
whole host of other businesses.
This
process is, ultimately, nothing more than the free market,
brutal as it may be at times, at work. As the number
of people who are involved in farm and ranch operations has
shrunk, there are thus fewer and fewer people in the area
who require everything from hair cuts, cattle feed, hardware
supplies, tractor parts and new automobiles. As such, the
towns that sprung up in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s
to provide goods and services to the farms and ranches outside
of town have, essentially, lost much of the demand for these
goods and services that use to exist. And the result, perhaps
predictably, has been struggling small towns throughout most
regions of the Great Plains of the United States. And the
Hi-Line area of Montana has been no exception to this.
To put
things a bit in perspective, it’s worth examining
the population of several counties in the Hi-Line region
over the years.
| County |
1920 |
1930 |
1940 |
1950 |
1960 |
1970 |
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
| Blaine |
9057 |
9006 |
9566 |
8516 |
8091 |
6727 |
6999 |
6728 |
7009 |
| Glacier |
4178 |
5297 |
9034 |
9645 |
11,565 |
10,783 |
10,628 |
12,121 |
13,247 |
| Hill |
13,958 |
13,775 |
13,304 |
14,285 |
18,653 |
17,358 |
17,985 |
17,654 |
16,673 |
| Liberty |
2416 |
2198 |
2209 |
2180 |
2624 |
2359 |
2329 |
2295 |
2158 |
| Phillips |
9311 |
8208 |
7892 |
6334 |
6027 |
5386 |
5367 |
5163 |
4601 |
| Roosevelt |
10,347 |
10,672 |
9806 |
9580 |
11,731 |
10,365 |
10,467 |
10,999 |
10,620 |
| Toole |
3724 |
3714 |
6769 |
6867 |
7904 |
5839 |
5559 |
5046 |
5267 |
| Valley |
11,542 |
11,181 |
15,181 |
11,353 |
17,080 |
11,471 |
10,250 |
8239 |
7675 |
Major Towns in each county
Blaine County : Chinook
Glacier County : Cut Bank, Browning
Hill County : Havre
Liberty County : Chester
Phillips County : Malta
Roosevelt County : Culbertson, Wolf Point
Toole County : Shelby, Sunburst
Valley County : Glasgow, Fort Peck
As the
statistics show, some counties have been hit harder by
population loss than others. Valley County and Phillips
County, in particular, have bee especially hard hit. Meanwhile,
thanks to its proximity to Glacier National Park and a
boost from the oil and gas industry, Glacier County has
actually increased population at a decent clip. Hill County
has also done reasonably well, helped out by the development
in Havre, the largest town on the Montana Hi-Line.
As such,
throughout the Hi-Line region of Montana, the results of
this shift in population and resources are plain to see.
Numerous downtowns in the Hi-Line area of Montana are seemingly
half empty – full of closed down and abandoned stores,
abandoned grain elevators and homes. Even in counties that
have not lost population you’ll find many abandoned
buildings, stores and farms. This is generally due to the
decline in the smaller agricultural towns of the county that
coincide with a rise of population in the county seat.

Article
Continued on the Next Page
Top
of Page
|